Gerke v parity insurance
WebGerke v Parity Ins. Co 6 & Reyneke v Mutual & Federal Ins Co 7 These cases followed the English (Wise v Kay 8). The court rejected the strict functional approach and instead … WebGeneral Accident Versekeringsmaatskappy SA Bpk v Uijs NO 1993 4 SA 228 (A). Gericke v Sack 1978 1 SA 821 (A). Gerke v Parity Insurance Co Ltd 1966 3 SA 484 (W). Gibson v Berkowitz 1996 4 SA 1029 (W). Gijzen v Verrinder 1965 1 SA 806 (D). Gluckman v Schneider 1936 AD 151. Gouda Boerdery BK v Transnet Ltd 2005 5 SA 490 (SCA).
Gerke v parity insurance
Did you know?
WebApr 1, 1972 · Gerke v. Parity Insurance Co. Ltd 6', where the court had to decide upon an award of damages for loss of amenities and shortened expectation of life in favour of a … Webconflicting decisions of the High Court, namely Gerke v Parity Insurance Co Ltd 1966 (1) SA 484 (W) in which Ludorf J, who, being persuaded by the position in English law, decided that such loss is compensatable, and Collins v Administrator, Cape 1995 (4) SA 73 (C) where Scott J declined to follow the
Web8.Gerke v Parity Insurance Co Ltd 1966 (3) SA 484 (W) 10. 9.Collins v Administrator, Cape 1995 (4) SA 73 (C) 10. 10.Nkala And Others v Harmony Gold Mining Co Ltd and Others … WebGerke v Parity Insurance Co Ltd 1966 (1) SA 484 (W) Collins v Administrator, Cape 1995 (4) SA 73 (C) B Wanda ‘Problems arising in compensating unconscious plaintiff for loss of amenities of life: a comparative survey’ (2005) 38(1) The Comparative International Law Journal of Southern Africa 113 -142.
WebGerke v Parity Insurance Co Ltd, followed later by Reyneke v Mutual and Federal Insurance Co Ltd. Collins v Administrator, Cape. Currently the position is thus that whether an unconscious plaintiff will be entitled to claim anything will depend on where in SA the claim is instituted, although it appears that a number of cases have followed ... WebJul 6, 2024 · The first, Gerke NO v Parity Insurance Co Ltd 1966 (3) SA 484 (W) , was a case of a 21-year-old man who had been rendered permanently unconscious in a motor accident. His condition was described as 'vegetative' and he was expected to live for only another six months. In his judgment, Ludorf J referred to Wise v Kaye and Another …
WebParity Insurance Co Ltd v Van den Bergh 1966 (4) SA 112 (W) Road Accident Fund v Russel 2001 (2) SA 34 (SCA) TOPIC 5 Fault This week you will be introduced to the concept of fault and its definitions. Intention as a form of faulty will be examined as well as the capacity and accountability of minors. Fault
r l stines monsterville the cabinet of soulsWebStudy with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Give a definition of non-patrimonial loss;, Explain, identify and illustrate by means of examples the different elements in the concept of non-patrimonial loss;, Explain the different ways in which personality infringements can occur; and more. rl stines dont think about it full movieWebMar 30, 2012 · The Gerke Law Firm assists clients throughout the state of Texas, including matters in Harris, Fort Bend, Brazoria, Wharton, Washington, Waller, Austin, Burleson, … rl stine the haunting hour huluWebGerke v Parity Insurance Co. applied the objective theory but held that subjectiev factors are relevant regarding quantum. Southern Insurance Association v Bailey. flexible approach taken: the function to be served is one of the factors to be considered. Collins v Administrator, Cape. rl stine show on disney plusWebconflicting decisions of the High Court, namely Gerke v Parity Insurance Co Ltd 1966 (1) SA 484 (W) in which Ludorf J, who, being persuaded by the position in English law, … smtp username not providedhttp://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECPEHC/2024/8.pdf r.l. stine the haunting hour castWebMar 1, 2005 · This is so because there are two conflicting decisions of the High Court, namely Gerke v Parity Insurance Co Ltd 1966 (1) SA 484 (W) in which Ludorf J, who, … rl stine the haunting hour don\\u0027t think about