WebContributed by: P&A Law Offices On 14th July 2024, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (“Supreme Court”) delivered its judgment in the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. … Web5 gen 2024 · Section 65B certificate mandatory. In Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal case the Supreme Court (SC) on 14th July 2024 held that the …
Arjun Panditrao Khotkar vs Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal …
WebARJUN PANDITRAO KHOTKAR vs. KAILASH KUSHANRAO GORANTYAL 2024 Latest Caselaw 421 SC. Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 421 SC Judgement Date : 14 Jul 2024 … Web14 lug 2024 · Supreme Court: In a reference dealing with the interpretation of Section 65B of the Evidence Act, 1872 that deals with admissibility of electronic records, the 3-judge bench of RF Nariman, S. Ravindra Bhat and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ has held that the certificate required under Section 65B(4) is a condition precedent to the admissibility of evidence by … lss treatments
landmark case arjun panditrao landmark judgement on ... - Studocu
WebRequirement for Acceptance of Electronic Evidence 25. Recently, in the case of Arjun Pandit Khotkar Vs. Kailash Khushan Rao Gorantyal [2024 (7) SCC 1], the Apex Court in a reference dealing with the interpretation of Section 65B of the Evidence Act, has held that, the certificate required under Section 65B (4) of the Act is a condition precedent to the … While a concurring opinion in Arjun Panditrao (penned by V. Ramasubramanian, J.) looks at these global best practices and suggests a reconsideration of Section 65-B, we argue that the Court’s reasoning and conclusion would have been enriched by drawing on comparative lessons, especially from the United … Visualizza altro Section 65-B of the Evidence Act, 1872 (Act), dealing with the admissibility of electronic evidence, has emerged as one of the most controversial provisions under the Act over the … Visualizza altro Under the scheme of the Act, electronic evidence is primarily governed by Sections 65-A and 65-B. The purpose of Section 65-A is only to … Visualizza altro In Arjun Panditrao, based on the non obstante clause in sub-section (1) of Section 65-B, the Supreme Court proceeded to hold that Section 65-B operates … Visualizza altro As mentioned earlier, Section 65-B(4) allows a party to produce a certificate which avers to “any of the things” mentioned therein as proof of one or more of those things. … Visualizza altro Web17 gen 2024 · HC relied on the Supreme Court judgment of Arjun Pandit Rao Khotkar vs. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal and Tofan Singh vs. State of Tamil Nadu where the statements to Narcotics officers were not confessional statements and could not by themselves be relied upon during trial. jcpenney wilmington nc hair salon